<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">

    <channel>
        <title>Examining the standard - 2.11 Storage provision</title>
        <link>http://www.dialogue-app.com/archivesaccreditation/new-examining-the-standard-2.11-storage-provision</link>
        <description>Latest Ideas</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <ttl>31</ttl>

        <item>
            <guid>http://www.dialogue-app.com/archivesaccreditation/new-examining-the-standard-2.11-storage-provision/compliance-with-older-standards-recognised</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:10:16 </pubDate>
            <title>Compliance with older standards recognised</title>
            <link>http://www.dialogue-app.com/archivesaccreditation/new-examining-the-standard-2.11-storage-provision/compliance-with-older-standards-recognised</link>
            <description> 
	Is it worth specifying that new builds designed and begun before 2012 could meet BS5454(2000), and possibly BS5454(1989) if that is relevant? 
</description>
            <comments>http://www.dialogue-app.com/archivesaccreditation/new-examining-the-standard-2.11-storage-provision/compliance-with-older-standards-recognised</comments>
        </item>

    </channel>
</rss>
