There is no need for separate preservation policies
The objectives for 'long-term preservation' are the same for physical and digital records; there is therefore no need to separate the two. One overall policy, covering both digital and analogue should suffice, as the principle is the same (even though the way we go about it is obviously different). In the first instance, this is about an institutional committment to preserving a collection/archive.
In my mind, preservation is the overarching principle, and other practices, like conservation, may be a sub-heading, not a separate policy (referring also to 2.3).
Why the contribution is important
This will reduce complexity without losing meaning.
Is this idea inappropriate? Please login to report this idea to a moderator
This specific need can therefore be clearly brought before employing institutions and other funders, for example, rather than being subsumed within a more generic heading.
Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate