There is no need for separate preservation policies

The objectives for 'long-term preservation' are the same for physical and digital records; there is therefore no need to separate the two. One overall policy, covering both digital and analogue should suffice, as the principle is the same (even though the way we go about it is obviously different). In the first instance, this is about an institutional committment to preserving a collection/archive.

In my mind, preservation is the overarching principle, and other practices, like conservation, may be a sub-heading, not a separate policy (referring also to 2.3).

Why the contribution is important

This will reduce complexity without losing meaning.

Current rating

2.5
Average score : 2.5
Based on : 4 votes
Posted by pauljs March 05, 2012 at 12:07
This would be a future ideal, in my view. More pragmatically, for so long as many services are still struggling to meet digital preservation needs, I would say that it needs to be highlighted separately within a preservation policy.

This specific need can therefore be clearly brought before employing institutions and other funders, for example, rather than being subsumed within a more generic heading.

Please login to flag this comment as inappropriate

Please login to add comments and rate ideas